This is what I have in mind...
I think it would be appropriate and beneficial to the welfare of the country, if Democrats and Republicans can forge an agreement regarding the upcoming 2012 Presidential election.
If Mitt Romney wins, Democrats have to agree not to go berserk that a rich, white Mormon born in Michigan is the president. They further agree not to say they hope Romney fails like Rush Limbaugh did after Obama was elected. They must also take a vow not to oppose everything Romney does regardless of whether they're in favor of it or not.
If Obama wins, Republicans must let him do his job, fill presidential appointments (like naming the new postmaster of Irving, North Dakota without blocking it), and let bills pass in the Senate with a simple majority instead of filibustering every piece of legislation that comes before them. The also have to shut up about Obama being an anti-American socialist Muslim from Kenya.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Blunt Talk About Abortion
BLUNT TALK ABOUT ABORTION
No sane person views abortion as just another birth control method.
No
sane person wants to go through an abortion.
Proponents
of pro-choice do not glorify abortion any more than proponents of pro-life glorify
genocide.
So
other than an adherence to fanatical, religious-based, self-righteous opinion,
why would any proponent of pro-life feel it necessary to dictate to another
human being what they can and cannot do with their own bodies? What business is
it of theirs? Who, specifically, gave them the right to tell other people how
to live? Who gave them the right to judge other people?
Well… Just ask them and they’ll tell you: it was gentle Jesus, meek and mild. He gave
them those rights. Him and his book…
Anthropomorphism
can only go so far. Sure, you can attribute human qualities to the character of
Jesus in the New Testament—scriptures claim He was both God and man; however,
the qualities and characteristics the rabid interventionists of the pro-life
crowd attribute to Jesus are no more biblically valid than is the Mars Rover.
Jesus never spoke a word about abortion nor did He ever speak a word about the
moment life begins or of the much-touted pro-life credo of the “sanctity of
life.”
Abortion
isn’t mentioned in the Bible because the ignorant desert-wandering tribes it
was written for had no conception of the female reproductive system and would
have no more idea of how to perform an abortion than a Neanderthal would have
of how to fly a Boeing 757.
And
nowhere in scripture is it written, “By the way, if we forgot to mention it,
just go ahead and make something up.”
Because
that’s exactly what they’re doing when they climb their pedestals of arrogance
and attempt to force everyone to abide by what they imagine to be “God’s will.”
They’re making it up. But they’re also sinning. They’re blaspheming. Oh, they
don’t realize it because in their narrow, concentrated hatred of anything
smacking of personal freedom, they believe they’re striking a blow for “decency,”
but what they’re actually doing is blaspheming.
You’d
go to hell for that.
You
see, they’re claiming to know the mind of God. They’re dictating to others on His
behalf. They’re taking the name of God in vain. That’s blasphemy, regardless of
the motives behind it and if abortion is a black and white issue without a
shade of gray, then so is blasphemy.
Pro-lifers
are obsessed with fetuses, but not so much with people. From the moment a
zygote is formed by the fertilization of an egg, pro-lifers are all about the fetus
and the sanctity of life. Once the fetus emerges and becomes a child, these
same pro-lifers lose interest quickly. Before it was a human, they were fixated
with protecting it; but the minute it sucks in its first breath, they’re
finished.
Neo-natal
care? You’re on your own, kid. Now that we can see you, you’re not that cute after all.
Tax
dollars for WIC? Nope. That’s socialism
and welfare. Women, infants, and children—you’re on your own.
Crack
baby? Piss off—your mother’s a whore.
Day
care? Head Start? Look…we’re like the airlines, okay? We got you here safely. That’s
all you get.
But come see us again when you’re 18
and can join the military. Then we’ll sing the Star Spangled Banner and beat
our chests about how wonderful our young men and women in uniform are, but
between the ages of birth to the age of 18, you can go fuck yourselves.
For
people who pride themselves on being compassionate, you don’t see a lot of it
in pro-lifers, at least not any genuine compassion. You do see a lot of hatred,
sanctimony, and pomposity, but no genuine compassion. You also see that sense
of moral superiority all phony Christians display along with their well-rehearsed
“camouflaged look of disdain.” It wouldn’t be Christian to openly show disdain,
so they work on acting as if they’re
trying so hard not to be judgmental…hiding
it just enough so you can still see
it, but you just know they’re
stifling it as best they can to save your miserable, heathen feelings. Watching
one of these performances is mesmerizing.
They
do not want anyone having an abortion for any reason.
And
again, no sane person would use abortion as a method of birth control. It’s too
expensive, it’s too time-consuming, and it’s too risky. It’s a medical
procedure. Using abortion as a method of birth control would be like being
catheterized because it’s more convenient than walking to the bathroom.
But
picture these scenarios:
A
couple who were overjoyed a few weeks ago when the home pregnancy test showed
positive rush to the hospital, the wife cramping and in obvious agony. An
ultrasound shows the fetus is implanted in one of her fallopian tubes—not in
her uterus where it should be. The wife is in very real danger. But rather than
terminate the pregnancy immediately, the doctor puts the wife in a room, dopes
her up, and lets her wait out the pain, watching for either the fetus’s heart
to stop beating or for the wife’s fallopian tube to rupture.
*A
girl arrives in the emergency room in lower abdominal agony and with heavy
bleeding. An intern determines that she is having a miscarriage. Instead of
treating her, the intern calls for a gynecologist who forces the young woman to
submit to an examination whether she wants one or not to determine whether the
miscarriage is a common, natural event or whether it’s a crime scene.
*During
divorce hearings, a man described as a “one-man-cult” who claimed all his
actions, which included taking two of his daughters as brides were “guided by
God” is arrested when his sobbing, battered, and bruised 13 and 15-year-old-daughters
testify that he raped them both while their mother was visiting a sick relative
three months prior to the trial hearing. Charges against the man include
incest, assault, forcible confinement, corrupting the morals of children, and
rape. Both girls are pregnant.
*An
attractive, 40ish, vehemently pro-life mother of three, whose husband works for
the city planning commission, is leaving the Bell Hill Baptist Church late one
evening after volunteering to assist the church secretary by stuffing envelopes
announcing the annual bake sale. As she reaches her car and fumbles for her
keys, a mentally disabled, syphilitic, homeless man appears out of nowhere, grabs
her around the throat, forces her to the ground, shoves a filthy rag into her
mouth, tears off her skirt, and violently rapes her.
*An
older couple, their two children grown, educated, and married with families of
their own, are making love one evening and the condom breaks. They hope for the
best, but the woman misses her next period. A positive pregnancy test results
in a follow-up gynecologist visit and the woman is pregnant. Subsequent tests
indicate the likelihood of the child having severe Down’s Syndrome is extremely
high.
What
did these people do wrong? What exactly is it that would bring the pro-life
cause screaming down on their heads demanding that they let nature take its
course? An ectopic pregnancy, a natural miscarriage in progress, incest, rape,
and an accidental, unwanted pregnancy…
And
the pro-lifers say, “Nope. Have the kid. We don’t care if you die or suffer. We
don’t care if it’s your own father’s child. We don’t care that you’ll remember
that rape each time you look at the baby. We don’t care if your condom broke
and you’re bringing a child you can’t afford or can’t care for into the
world. We just don’t care. We cared before
they were born. We cared so much before
they were born that we’d do anything to force you to have that kid. But we don’t
care now.”
Where
is the logic in this line of thought? Where is the logic in demanding that other people—not you, but
other people—do what you want them to
do because you believe God is
anti-abortion? Medical estimates are that 30% to 50% of the pregnancies in the
United States end in miscarriage. Among abortionists, God appears quite prolific.
The
entire right-to-life movement is a farce. A ploy. A smoke-and-mirrors parlor
trick. These people aren’t pro-life, they’re anti-woman. Even the women who are
pro-life are anti-woman. Their express purpose in championing this sick,
twisted, backward philosophy is to “keep women in their place.”
The
pro-life men in this country are scared to death by any woman who has the
audacity to believe she’s her own woman in control of her own destiny and her
own body. These men like the fact
that their Bible has put them in charge. Even the wimpiest little Casper
Milquetoast in the country can walk into church and hear God command, “I do not
permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent!”
and brother, do they ever love that.
Pro-life
women are also scared to death by any woman who has the audacity to believe she
controls her own body—and they also want women under the control of men. By
women, they mean other women. The ones who aren’t them.
The
bottom line, the ultimate bottom line of this entire debate, once it is
stripped of all the false trappings used to attempt to make it appear
legitimate, is this: If men could get pregnant, an abortion would be easier to
get than a pack of cigarettes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)